Leaving a comment to a specific post on the Constructive Science blog is really very simple...
At the bottom of each post (such as this one), you'll see a dashed line (-----).
Right below that dashed line, you'll see something like this (the blue links in this example are *not* active):
Posted by Tony Mase on May 27, 2005 at 08:44 PM in Reader Questions | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
You can view comments already left and/or leave a comment to the post by clicking on the blue, underlined Comments (0) link (the number in parentheses shows how many comments have already been left for that post).
You'll be taken to a new page where you'll see the comments already left for that post and a set of boxes for posting your comment. If there are already a lot of comments, you'll have to scroll down to the bottom of the page to see the boxes.
To leave your comment, simply:
- Type your name in the first box. Your first and last name is preferable. However, your first name only is acceptable. Fake names are *not* acceptable.
- Type your e-mail address in the second box. It's *not* okay to use a fake e-mail address.
- Type the "URL of your blog (beginning with http://), if you have one, in the third box. You can leave this box blank if you don't have a blog.
- Type your comment and/or question in the fourth box (the large "comments" box).
When you're finished, click the "preview" button to see how your comment looks and/or click the "post" button to post your comment. Please be patient at this point. Sometimes it takes the blog a little while to accept the comment.
That's it...
It's that simple! :-)
What if you post a comment then find out it contains an error or you want to take your entire comment back?
Simply leave another comment explaining the situation and we'll fix your comment or delete it for you as soon as we can.
Please note:
- Anonymous comments are *not* allowed.
- HTML and links (URLs) are *not* allowed in comments.
- We reserve the right to edit or delete any comment we deem inappropriate for any reason.
Those who abuse the privilege of leaving comments will be banned from leaving comments on the Constructive Science blog.
One last thing...
Before leaving your first comment on the Constructive Science blog, please read my previous post on proper blogging etiquette:
Click Here => Proper Blogging Etiquette (Grandma Calls it "Manners")
Thanks! :-)














In all the writings of WDW, there is one point I allways had problems to accept and start to apply seriously the whole philosophy.
About "Increasing life" :-In order to know more, do more,and be more we must have more; we must have things to use,for we learn, and do, and become, only by using things. We must get rich, so that we can live more.-
How to explain...
Its because I know that in other writings WDW shows a deep spiritual philosophy, that I imagine there must be the right way to interpret those words.
Otherwise,it sound materialistic to me, shopping-orientated to incourage consumism e competition, in a society where it is already a problem.
I'am agreed that in the process of becoming rich we have to be carefull not to mix spiritual readings, or likely we get confuse and out of focus.
However, still this repeating that we need things, buy things, and that we MUST get rich to live more, well, does'nt match the fact that become free from attachments and dont relay too much upon material things , it may lead to slavery and weakness in our inner power, promoting desires after desires, in an endless ran for happiness and never satisfied.
So, please, I would love a good explanation to be able to practice Wattle's writings and feel that are meaninful and in line with my believe that we can create our own abundance and in the mean time pursue a complete spiritual growth with a feeling of freedom within.
Thank you heaps. Madalene
Posted by: Madalene Gibson | January 31, 2008 at 08:07 AM
Hi Madalene,
You're welcome heaps. :-)
I'll be addressing your "dilemma" in an upcoming article sometime within the next few weeks...
Stay tuned! :-)
Tony
Posted by: Tony Mase | February 04, 2008 at 09:32 AM